Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Med Schools Focus on Geriatrics Training - Approaches Differ

"Medical Schools Use Different Approaches to Geriatrics Education"
By Anne Blank, Special to the Reporter
The AAMC Reporter, February 2006
When a newly graduated physician from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) first noticed changes in his grandmother's behavior, he recognized the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and quickly got her the medical care that she needed. Surprisingly, his specialty is not geriatrics but pediatrics.

Cathy Powers, M.D., associate professor of geriatrics and head of the education division in the Donald W. Reynolds Department of Geriatrics at UAMS, tells this story to illustrate the success of a geriatrics program that she helped initiate.

"We know that out of our class of 150 medical students, we're not going to get 150 geriatricians," Powers said. "We stress to students who are going into different specialties how geriatrics will impact them."

With the first group of baby boomers approaching age 60, the need for qualified physicians trained in geriatrics is more pressing than ever before. An analysis of current trends indicates that during the next 10 years, people ages 55 to 64 will represent the fastest-growing sector of the adult population. By the year 2029, individuals born during the baby-boom years will reach age 65 or older. Between 1950 and 2004, this U.S. population group climbed from 12 million to 36 million people, according to the National Center for Health Statistics, and is expected to continue to increase.

With today's medical advances, America's aging population will live longer after suffering from an acute disease, such as cancer, or be able to cope with a chronic disease, such as diabetes, for much longer than in the past.

The concern is that while the number of elderly people is increasing, the number of physicians going into geriatrics is not growing commensurately. In fact, as of 2002, the American Geriatrics Society identified only 9,000 practicing geriatricians in the United States.

"The main thing is that we've got a burgeoning need for people who are going to be able to put the problems of the elderly all together in a package, to be able to treat the whole person, and that we are desperately short of geriatricians in this country who can do that type of care," said Powers.

In continuing efforts to address this shortage of physicians trained in geriatrics, the AAMC joined forces with the John A. Hartford Foundation in 2000 to distribute to 40 medical schools more than $5 million earmarked for geriatrics training and education. In the six years since the Hartford grants were awarded, M. Brownell Anderson, senior associate vice president in the AAMC's Division of Medical Education, has noticed a definite increase among medical school graduates both in the level of exposure to and comfort with geriatrics, as indicated by their responses to the AAMC's annual Graduation Questionnaire.

"Our goal has been to ensure that students, regardless of the field that they are choosing, recognize that there are different approaches that must be taken with a mature patient, with an aging patient," Anderson said. "There are different social needs, there are different physical needs, there are different things that you have to think about in taking care of them that you may not if you're just approaching everybody like a healthy 35-year-old adult."...

Not all medical schools subscribe to the idea of a dedicated geriatrics clerkship. At the University of Michigan Medical School, the geriatrics curriculum is integrated into the four-year medical school program because the goal was not to increase the number of requirements in an already packed schedule but to reduce this number, said Jeffrey Halter, M.D., professor of internal medicine, chief of the division of geriatric medicine, and director of the Geriatrics Center and Institute of Gerontology.

"To add another requirement was somewhat in the face of our own school's look at curriculum reform," Halter said.

Since elderly patients often have chronic diseases, it is imperative that medical students spend more time with these patients than a one-month clerkship can provide, Halter said.

"Having someone come into a long-term care facility and get the two- and three- and four-week exposure, that's a pretty short length of time for someone who's in a process of care that is measured in at least weeks to months," Halter said.

Likewise, the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health has integrated its geriatrics curriculum across the whole four years of medical school. Although the university first started this process in 1992, it wasn't until 1999, with support from a Hartford grant and the AAMC, that the four-year integrated curriculum reached fruition, according to Steven Barczi, M.D., assistant professor at Madison VA Hospital, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, an affiliate of the University of Wisconsin, and director of the university's Geriatric Medicine Fellowship Program and the Diamond Team Geriatric Medical Clinics.

One of the problems with traditional geriatrics training was that students weren't introduced to it early enough, Barczi said. During the first and second years of medical school, students spend most of their time in the classroom buried in books, with just a sampling of what it is like to interact with patients. In contrast, integrated geriatrics programs are not only allowing first- and second-year students to have contact with patients; they are encouraging it through mentoring programs that link students with senior citizens in their school's community.

"They really love that," Barczi said. "Any time they can have a chance to interact with a live body, a patient, rather than with a book in a lecture hall, they really get enthusiastic."

Powers agrees that there is a need for an integrated approach in geriatrics education, but says that the dedicated clerkship is imperative, as well. The one-month clerkship teaches students how to comprehensively treat the whole patient rather than one particular complication at a time, she said.

"To have a month dedicated to geriatrics gives students an appreciation of all the different problems that a geriatrics patient may have," Powers said. "If a patient is in cardiology, they're focusing on the heart, and not necessarily the attendant diabetes, or the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or the multiple other diseases that a lot of the elderly can have."

Friday, March 24, 2006

Case Reserve Med School Facing Financial Problems?

"Case Squeezing Medical School, Dean Says"
By Regina McEnery
The Cleveland Plain Dealer, March 24, 2006

Less than a week after Case Western Reserve University President Edward Hundert abruptly resigned, the medical school's dean chastised the administration for undercutting pledged investments in the medical school and advised faculty and staff members of impending spending cuts.

In an eight-page e-mail sent Monday, Dr. Ralph Horwitz said the medical school will continue to make strategic investments but will take steps to reduce expenses in its administrative and academic units and defer or eliminate projects that are not critical to the school's mission or linked to faculty recruitment.

Horwitz said he had authorized spending millions to reform medical education, expand laboratories and recruit key faculty members in disciplines including cancer, cardiology and genetics since arriving from Yale University nearly three years ago.The expenditures were part of the medical school's campaign to improve its competitive edge and a key component of the university's ambitious Vision Investment Program, a five-year plan to funnel $181 million into undergraduate teaching, academic medicine, graduate research and other areas.

The university was to operate in the red until 2008, but the approach, and Hundert, came under fire when fund-raising efforts and federal research dollars that were supposed to erase the planned deficit fell short.

Horwitz said $57.5 million of the Vision program was dedicated to the medical school. He said he had understood the money to be a long overdue investment needed to restore the school's national reputation and competitiveness for research grants. Now, the university is treating it more like a loan, he said.

Before he arrived, Horwitz wrote, the medical school was losing key faculty members, driving away promising students and losing its competitive edge because of outmoded educational facilities, antiquated laboratories, decaying buildings and other problems....

Horwitz also took aim at disproportionate growth in Case's central administration expenses, particularly in fund raising and marketing, saying it contributed to the university's financial drain. Unresolved financial issues with University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case's longtime affiliate, over medical grants also are impeding the flow of revenue to the medical school, he said.


Tuesday, March 21, 2006

HMS News: 4.2% of '06 Applicants Accepted - Diversity Policy Changed

"HMS Amends Admit Policy"
By LAURENCE H. M. HOLLAND
The Harvard Crimson, March 21, 2006
In a move that brings its admissions policies in line with the rest of the University, Harvard Medical School (HMS) will eliminate an admissions subcommittee dedicated to applicants from “under-represented minorities” next year, according to HMS administrators.

The announcement comes a week after HMS sent out admissions decisions to its incoming Class of 2010, and almost three years after the Supreme Court struck down the University of Michigan’s point-based undergraduate admissions policy in the cases of Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger.

HMS officials acknowledged that the policy shift came in response to fears that their system could be viewed as unconstitutional.

“It’s well-intentioned, but we’ve been told repeatedly by the University counsel and consultants for the University counsel that it is not a wise policy to maintain,” said Dr. Robert J. Mayer, faculty associate dean for admissions at HMS, yesterday....

According to Mayer, HMS started to review its affirmative action policy in late 2004.
Under the new system, minority applications will simply be flagged to ensure that at least one minority admissions officer evaluates the application and interviews the applicant, Poussaint said in an interview last Friday.

Mayer added that the change in the admissions process did not indicate a reduced commitment to diversity.

“There is absolutely no change in our commitment to diversity,” Mayer said. “If anything, it enhances the commitment to under-represented minorities.”

In his interview with The Crimson yesterday, Mayer also released statistics on the incoming Class of 2010, the last HMS class to be admitted under the old affirmative action policy.

According to Mayer, the acceptance rate at HMS remained steady this year at 4.2 percent. The school remains at the top of many students’ wish lists: Mayer said that the school’s haul of 4,683 applications meant that one of every seven medical school applicants in the country applied to Harvard. Minority applications were down slightly, but both Mayer and Poussaint said that the drop was well within standard deviations.